Federal contractor · HILLSBORO, IL
HURST-ROSCHE, INC.
HURST-ROSCHE, INC. received $384.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+177% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $2.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($384.6K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $384.6K
- New awards
- 3
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- CL37UFUHCWU5
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $384.6K in FY2026 together.
- HURST-ROSCHE, INC.HILLSBORO, IL · Family page$384.6K
- HURST-ROSCHE INCARNOLD, MO$0
- HURST-ROSCHE, INCEAST SAINT LOUIS, IL$0
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-10-05
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 357.6KFY2022
- 915.3KFY2023
- 329.6KFY2024
- 138.7KFY2025
- 384.6KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$384.6K100%3 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$384.6K100%
Where the work was performed
- St. Louis city, MO$334.1K87%
- Montgomery County, IL$59.1K15%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· St. Louis city, MO· Facilities & utilities· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· W912P926FA129
- TAYLOR SPRINGS CPT FY26$59.1KDepartment of the Army· Montgomery County, IL· Facilities & utilities· Feb 3, 2026 – Feb 3, 2026· W912P926FA045
- Department of the Army· Alexander County, IL· Facilities & utilities· Sep 22, 2025 – Nov 20, 2025· W912P925FA109
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- AVID4 ENGINEERING, INC.$611.8K−100% in FY2026RAPID CITY, SD · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- HAMPTON, VA · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- BLACK & VEATCH - CUSHING TERRELL JV$655.7K−100% in FY2026BILLINGS, MT · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.