Federal contractor · HILLSBORO, IL

HURST-ROSCHE, INC.

HURST-ROSCHE, INC. received $384.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+177% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $2.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($384.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$384.6K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CL37UFUHCWU5
Small businessHUBZone firm

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $384.6K in FY2026 together.

  1. HURST-ROSCHE, INC.HILLSBORO, IL · Family page
    $384.6K
  2. $0
  3. HURST-ROSCHE, INCEAST SAINT LOUIS, IL
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · jev-1.13.0 · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 357.6KFY2022
  2. 915.3KFY2023
  3. 329.6KFY2024
  4. 138.7KFY2025
  5. 384.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$384.6K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· St. Louis city, MO· Facilities & utilities· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· W912P926FA129
  2. Department of the Army· Montgomery County, IL· Facilities & utilities· Feb 3, 2026 – Feb 3, 2026· W912P926FA045
  3. Department of the Army· Alexander County, IL· Facilities & utilities· Sep 22, 2025 – Nov 20, 2025· W912P925FA109

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. AVID4 ENGINEERING, INC.$611.8K−100% in FY2026
    RAPID CITY, SD · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HAMPTON, VA · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BLACK & VEATCH - CUSHING TERRELL JV$655.7K−100% in FY2026
    BILLINGS, MT · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.