Federal contractor · POTOMAC, MD

IBS GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

IBS GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. received $446K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+46% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $2.1M. Its largest customer was District of Columbia Courts ($446.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$446K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
CC6AJLVMTQS5
Other than small businessMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 249.9KFY2022
  2. 333.8KFY2023
  3. 800.3KFY2024
  4. 306.2KFY2025
  5. 446KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$446K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $446.6K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $446.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Office of the Inspector General· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 14, 2024 – May 5, 2026· 70VT1524F00012
  2. District of Columbia Courts· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Dec 12, 2025 – Apr 28, 2026· 95C67826P0053

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $307.5K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $564.8K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $872.3K reported

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. KPMG LLP$251.1K
    MC LEAN, VA · 3 subawards · Accounting, tax preparation, bookkeeping, and payroll services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHRISTOPHER NEAL MCRAE$219K+81% in FY2026
    LAUREL, MD · 8.2% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDistrict of Columbia Courts · Executive, legislative, and other general government supportDistrict of Columbia Courts · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. TERRY J. LAMBERT$98.6K−105% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 6.4% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDistrict of Columbia Courts · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 6.4% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDistrict of Columbia Courts · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 23 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.