Federal contractor · RAMAT HASHARON

IMI SYSTEMS LTD

IMI SYSTEMS LTD received $7.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−5% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $102.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($7.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$7.2M
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GUWJUXAM1J79
Other than small businessForeign-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.6MFY2017
  2. 13.8MFY2018
  3. 15.7MFY2019
  4. 9.1MFY2020
  5. 9.5MFY2021
  6. 8.3MFY2022
  7. 13.6MFY2023
  8. 13.6MFY2024
  9. 7.6MFY2025
  10. 7.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$7.2M100%
    1 awards
  2. U.S. Special Operations Command$00.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$7.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$7.2M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $7.2M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $7.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$7.2M
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. MJU-67/36MM SPECTRAL PAYLOADS$13.6M
    U.S. Special Operations Command· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 11, 2023 – May 13, 2026· H9224123F0081
  2. XM216E5 FLARES$8.3M
    U.S. Special Operations Command· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 27, 2022 – May 13, 2026· H9224122F0095
  3. MJU67 78$7.2M
    Department of the Navy· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 6, 2026 – Mar 6, 2026· N0010426FA703

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHEMRING AUSTRALIA PTY LTD$31.1M
    LARA, AUS · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other chemical product and preparation manufacturing
  2. DREW MARINE USA INC$42.7M−35% in FY2026
    WHIPPANY, NJ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other chemical product and preparation manufacturing
  3. CARTRIDGE ACTUATED DEVICES INC$18.3M+4% in FY2026
    FAIRFIELD, NJ · 2 entities · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other chemical product and preparation manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.