Federal contractor · ARLINGTON, VA

INCENTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP LLC

INCENTIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP LLC received $22.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (+24% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $526.1M. Its largest customer was Federal Transit Administration ($9.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$22.1M
New awards
15
Sole-source
14%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CGTWKQ7DSVD7
Parent company
ICF INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C. company family: 7 registered entities, $383.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C.RESTON, VA · Family page
    $262.5M
  2. $90.4M
  3. ICF MACRO INCRESTON, VA
    $8.4M
  4. $184.5K
  5. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 17.5MFY2017
  2. 37.3MFY2018
  3. 75.4MFY2019
  4. 74.6MFY2020
  5. 115.5MFY2021
  6. 86MFY2022
  7. 45.2MFY2023
  8. 34.6MFY2024
  9. 17.8MFY2025
  10. 22.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$12.8M58%
  2. Professional services$9.3M42%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition12%
    US 39% · $2.6M
  • Sole-source awards14%
    US 30% · $3.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · -$564.4K
  • Urgency justifications14%
    US 5.1% · $3.2M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 5, 2019 – Feb 13, 2026· 75N98119F00012
  2. Department of State· Arlington County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 28, 2018 – Aug 3, 2026· 19AQMM18F4804
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jan 31, 2020 – May 11, 2026· 50310220F0038
  4. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 24, 2019 – Aug 25, 2026· 75P00119F80217
  5. Federal Transit Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 24, 2025 – Sep 10, 2026· 69319525F10045N
  6. Federal Transit Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 8, 2023 – Jan 6, 2026· 69319523F10035N
  7. Department of State· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Apr 1, 2025 – Aug 25, 2026· 19AQMM25C0601
  8. Federal Highway Administration· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 28, 2022 – Sep 25, 2026· 693JJ322F00431N

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $131.6K (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

  1. HARPER PAIGE, LLC$131.6K100%
    SILVER SPRING, MD · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 0.6% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $21.8M paid out · $1M received
  • FY2022: $11.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $345.2K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $52K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $131.6K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

600 companies · $329.2M reported

  1. WALTHAM, MA · 93 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WHOLEPOINT SYSTEMS, LLC$12.5M
    FREDERICKSBURG, VA · 23 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. PATH$9.4M
    SEATTLE, WA · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

65 companies · $198.8M reported

  1. ROCKVILLE, MD · 2 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. GREENVILLE, NC · 4 subawards
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 103 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SPARKSOFT CORPORATION$313.9M−9% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 2 entities · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Computer systems design and related services
  2. INDEX ANALYTICS LLC$365.7M+35% in FY2026
    BALTIMORE, MD · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Computer systems design and related servicesFood and Drug Administration · Computer systems design and related services
  3. COMPANION DATA SERVICES LLC$535.6M−20% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, SC · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C. (7 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • ICF Consulting Group, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$100K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$140K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$100K
    4 reports
  2. 2026$40K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Government issues6 reports

Who was contacted

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BGR Government Affairs$140K
    6 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.