Federal contractor · LEXINGTON PARK, MD

INDYNE, INC.

INDYNE, INC. received $24.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−14% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $83.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($13M).

Obligations · FY2026
$24.9M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
ZNL2JJJ95X84
Parent company
INDYNE, INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the INDYNE, INC. company family: 3 registered entities, $86.7M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. INDYNE, INC.COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · Family page
    $59.3M
  2. INDYNE, INCCRESTVIEW, FL
    $2.6M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.7MFY2023
  2. 20.9MFY2024
  3. 28.9MFY2025
  4. 24.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$13M52%
  2. Facilities & utilities$11.9M48%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Pembina County, ND· Facilities & utilities· Jan 30, 2023 – Feb 23, 2026· FA251823C0002
  2. Department of the Army· Cochise County, AZ· Research & development· Sep 19, 2023 – May 19, 2026· W91RUS23C0019
  3. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 4, 2025 – Dec 4, 2025· HQ085926FE469

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $482.2K (10 subawards)

3 sub-recipients

  1. SIERRA VISTA, AZ · 4 subawards
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 4 subawards
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 1.9% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $1.9M paid out · $135.2K received
  • FY2024: $7.7M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $482.2K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

106 companies · $93.6M reported

  1. ANCHORAGE, AK · 13 subawards · Other telecommunications
  2. LEETON, MO · 4 subawards · Investigation and security services
  3. SIERRA VISTA, AZ · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $4.8M reported

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 1 subaward · Wired telecommunications carriers
  3. ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FIVE RIVERS ANALYTICS, LLC$217M+12% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · NAICS 5178Army · Computer systems design and related services
  2. GLOBAL REACH CONSULTING LLC$45.1M+17% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 12% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Other telecommunications
  3. RIYADH, SAU · 12% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.