Federal contractor · DYERSBURG, TN
INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C.
INLAND DREDGING COMPANY, L.L.C. received $53.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (−20% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $525.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($53.1M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $53.1M
- New awards
- 14
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 37%
- UEI
- NPJLGH6HJDD5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 34.8MFY2017
- 28.6MFY2018
- 27.6MFY2019
- 30.3MFY2020
- 82.4MFY2021
- 54.6MFY2022
- 75.3MFY2023
- 73MFY2024
- 66.1MFY2025
- 53.1MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$53.1M100%14 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$54M100%
Where the work was performed
- Warren County, MS$18.9M36%
- Galveston County, TX$10.4M20%
- Brazoria County, TX$8.9M17%
- Shelby County, TN$7.7M15%
- Bay County, FL$3.3M6.2%
- Tuscaloosa County, AL$2.8M5.2%
- Baldwin County, AL$2.4M4.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition37%US 39% · $19.8M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions37%US 8.7% · $19.8M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Matagorda County, TX· Construction & real property· Jun 6, 2024 – Feb 27, 2026· W912HY24C0004
- Department of the Army· Shelby County, TN· Construction & real property· May 29, 2025 – Feb 4, 2026· W912EQ25F0048
- Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Construction & real property· May 21, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· W912EE26CA009
- Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Construction & real property· Jun 3, 2026 – Jun 10, 2026· W912EE26CA010
- Department of the Army· Galveston County, TX· Construction & real property· Feb 5, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· W912HY26CA010
- Department of the Army· Brazoria County, TX· Construction & real property· Dec 17, 2025 – Jun 1, 2026· W912HY26CA004
- Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Apr 8, 2025 – May 12, 2026· W912EE25CA003
- HARBOR DREDGING$8.4MDepartment of the Army· Shelby County, TN· Construction & real property· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· W912EQ26FA043
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- MCCARTHY BUILDING COMPANIES, INC.$177.3M−79% in FY2026SAINT LOUIS, MO · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
- CALLAN MARINE LIMITED$158.5M+86,321% in FY2026GALVESTON, TX · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
- CURTIN MARITIME CORP$183.6M−66% in FY2026LONG BEACH, CA · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.