Federal contractor · FORT WORTH, TX

INMAR RX SOLUTIONS INC

INMAR RX SOLUTIONS INC received $252.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−99% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $138.2M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($248.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$252.4K
New awards
7
Sole-source
7.6%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EJTWU37ZMY93
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.2MFY2018
  2. 4.2MFY2019
  3. 4.5MFY2020
  4. 4.6MFY2021
  5. 18.3MFY2022
  6. 30.1MFY2023
  7. 30.4MFY2024
  8. 41.7MFY2025
  9. 252.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$216.7K83%
  2. Professional services$44.9K17%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition7.6%
    US 39% · $19.2K
  • Sole-source awards7.6%
    US 30% · $19.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Office of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Sep 21, 2023 – Aug 19, 2026· 75A50323C00025
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Alachua County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Jan 18, 2023 – Jan 21, 2026· 36C24823P0378
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Palm Beach County, FL· Health & medical· Sep 23, 2024 – May 27, 2026· 36C24824P2438
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Pinellas County, FL· Professional services· Aug 30, 2022 – Aug 31, 2026· 36C24822P2192
  5. Indian Health Service· Bernalillo County, NM· Facilities & utilities· Jun 30, 2021 – Sep 9, 2026· 75H70721P00148
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs· Jefferson County, KY· Health & medical· Jul 24, 2023 – Aug 14, 2026· 36C24923C0084
  7. Indian Health Service· La Paz County, AZ· Professional services· Feb 18, 2025 – Feb 12, 2026· 75H71225P00059

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TRI-COUNTY RECYCLING INC$5.5M+19% in FY2026
    MIAMI LAKES, FL · 1.1% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Waste collectionVeterans Affairs · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. MABBETT & ASSOCIATES, INC.$32.4M+42% in FY2026
    STONEHAM, MA · 1.3% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Waste collectionVeterans Affairs · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. DAYTON, TN · 1.3% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Waste collectionVeterans Affairs · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • INMAR, INC.AI match · 93%
Lobbying · 2025
$0
9 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$0

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$0
    16 reports
  2. 2024$0
    16 reports
  3. 2025$0
    9 reports
  4. 2026$0
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Agriculture3 reports
  2. Food industry (safety, labeling)3 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES3 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE3 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. WATKINSON MILLER PLLC$0
    14 reports
  2. Horizon Government Affairs$0
    12 reports
  3. Kelley Drye & Warren LLP$0
    9 reports
  4. ALSTON & BIRD LLP$0
    8 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.