Federal contractor · SAN DIEGO, CA

INNOVATUS TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING

INNOVATUS TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING received $9.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−58% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $95.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($8.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$9.5M
New awards
10
Sole-source
10%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FQDQTL1F3LT7
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 283.3KFY2017
  2. 4.2MFY2018
  3. 1.7MFY2019
  4. 3.3MFY2020
  5. 1.1MFY2021
  6. 10.1MFY2022
  7. 21.1MFY2023
  8. 21.8MFY2024
  9. 22.5MFY2025
  10. 9.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 9 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$5.7M60%
  2. Professional services$3.8M40%

Where the work was performed

  1. Norfolk city, VA$807.9K8.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition10%
    US 39% · $974.5K
  • Sole-source awards10%
    US 30% · $975K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · -$500
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Aug 17, 2022 – Jun 4, 2026· N0003922F3016
  2. Department of the Navy· York County, VA· IT & telecom· Mar 31, 2022 – Apr 7, 2026· N0003922F3009
  3. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· IT & telecom· Jul 31, 2024 – Mar 19, 2026· N0018924C0014
  4. Defense Health Agency· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Feb 7, 2025 – Feb 18, 2026· HT001125C0062
  5. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Dec 13, 2024 – Dec 8, 2025· N6600125F0128
  6. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· May 27, 2025 – May 20, 2026· N6600125C0056
  7. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Jan 9, 2026 – Mar 2, 2026· N6600126F8588
  8. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Jan 29, 2026 – May 8, 2026· N6600126F8626

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $3.4M reported

  1. ATLANTA, GA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing
  3. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MBF ARCHITECTS, P.A.$41M−94% in FY2026
    NEW BERN, NC · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LTM INC$41.1M−80% in FY2026
    HAVELOCK, NC · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. POWER ENGINEERS INC$41.5M+5.2% in FY2026
    HAILEY, ID · 2 entities · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.