Federal contractor · MINNEAPOLIS, MN

INOVALON PROVIDER, INC

INOVALON PROVIDER, INC received $209.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (−68% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $6.3M. Its largest customer was Indian Health Service ($119.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$209.9K
New awards
15
Sole-source
43%
Single offer
51%
UEI
JHT2JFM72CD6
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 586.8KFY2017
  2. 492.2KFY2018
  3. 540.9KFY2019
  4. 619.6KFY2020
  5. 721.3KFY2021
  6. 687KFY2022
  7. 767.6KFY2023
  8. 980.9KFY2024
  9. 652.5KFY2025
  10. 209.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 14 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$189.6K89%
  2. Professional services$23.2K11%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition94%
    US 39% · $197.6K
  • Sole-source awards43%
    US 30% · $90.2K
  • Single-offer competitions51%
    US 8.7% · $107.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Health and Human Services · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources· Maricopa County, AZ· IT & telecom· Aug 30, 2021 – Aug 31, 2026· 75H71221C00017
  2. Indian Health Service· Dewey County, SD· IT & telecom· Apr 20, 2021 – Mar 31, 2026· 75H70621C00006
  3. Indian Health Service· Apache County, AZ· IT & telecom· Mar 1, 2024 – Nov 18, 2025· 75H71024P00619
  4. Indian Health Service· Apache County, AZ· IT & telecom· May 14, 2026 – Aug 31, 2026· 75H71026P00344
  5. Indian Health Service· Apache County, AZ· IT & telecom· Aug 22, 2023 – Oct 22, 2025· 75H71023P01676
  6. Indian Health Service· Navajo County, AZ· IT & telecom· Feb 11, 2020 – Jul 30, 2026· 75H71020P00748
  7. Indian Health Service· McKinley County, NM· IT & telecom· May 29, 2020 – Aug 1, 2026· 75H71020P01377
  8. Indian Health Service· McKinley County, NM· IT & telecom· Aug 20, 2018 – Dec 2, 2025· 75H71018P01304

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $91.5K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $64.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $99.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $254.7K reported

  1. INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INSILICA LLC$1.3M−100% in FY2026
    BETHESDA, MD · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  2. PINNACLE 21, LLC$1.7M−108% in FY2026
    BLUE BELL, PA · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  3. GEONORTH, LLC$4M−109% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 entities · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveIndian Health Service · Data processing, hosting, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.