Federal contractor · MC LEAN, VA
INSERSO CORPORATION
INSERSO CORPORATION received $94.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+22% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $638.5M. Its largest customer was U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ($59.9M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $94.2M
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- K18HRGF7HW21
- Parent company
- INSERSO CORP
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 48.3MFY2017
- 38.3MFY2018
- 49.9MFY2019
- 49.7MFY2020
- 65MFY2021
- 57.5MFY2022
- 72.1MFY2023
- 86.3MFY2024
- 77MFY2025
- 94.2MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- 2 awards
- Department of the Air Force$17.8M19%2 awards
- Office of Justice Programs$16.5M18%1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$94.2M100.0%
- Research & development$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- Fairfax County, VA$60.8M65%
- Maricopa County, AZ$15.6M17%
- Montgomery County, OH$15.4M16%
- Houston County, GA$2.4M2.6%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Feb 3, 2022 – Aug 31, 2026· 70CTD022FR0000018
- U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement· Maricopa County, AZ· IT & telecom· Feb 9, 2022 – Jul 1, 2026· 70CTD022FR0000017
- Office of Justice Programs· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jun 30, 2022 – Sep 24, 2026· 15PTDE22F00000031
- Department of the Air Force· Montgomery County, OH· IT & telecom· Sep 11, 2024 – May 12, 2026· FA877024FB028
- Department of the Air Force· Houston County, GA· IT & telecom· Dec 19, 2023 – Dec 23, 2025· FA664324F0004
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 4, 2025 – Dec 4, 2025· HQ085926FE128
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $2.1M received
- FY2023: $93.2K paid out · $41.1K received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $496.2K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $207.1K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
1 company · $93.2K reported
- POTOMAC HAVEN INC.$93.2KMCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
Primes that pay it
2 companies · $2.9M reported
- MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
- RESTON, VA · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- TRM LABS, INC.$122.9M+782% in FY2026SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement · Computer systems design and related services
- CYNERGY PROFESSIONAL SYSTEMS LLC$413.2M+240% in FY2026LAGUNA HILLS, CA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services
- DEV TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC$442M−29% in FY2026RESTON, VA · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.