Federal contractor · BLUE LAKE, CA

INTEGRAL ECOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER

No contract obligations recorded for INTEGRAL ECOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER in FY2026. Since FY2018: $265.6K. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($0). It also received $44.6K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
WC48EZUJM1H9
Parent company
INTEGRAL ECOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 54.5KFY2018
  2. 61.2KFY2019
  3. 0FY2020
  4. 0FY2022
  5. 149.9KFY2025
  6. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· San Bernardino County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Jul 25, 2025 – Nov 20, 2025· 140L1225P0070

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

INTEGRAL ECOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER received $44.6K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (1 new awards), −78% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 10.665 · Schools and Roads - Grants to States ($44.6K).

Assistance · FY2026
$44.6K
New awards
1
Actions
2
Since FY2021
$1.8M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 564.7KFY2021
  2. 155.8KFY2022
  3. 823.3KFY2023
  4. 3.6KFY2024
  5. 200KFY2025
  6. 44.6KFY2026

By type

  1. Other assistance$44.6K100%

Top programs

  1. 10.665 · Schools and Roads - Grants to States$44.6K100%
  2. 10.699 · Partnership Agreements-$2.050.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Forest Service$44.6K100%
    Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 10.699 · Partnership Agreements· Forest Service· Other financial assistance· May 6, 2026 – May 6, 2026· 20PA11051100031
  2. 10.665 · Schools and Roads - Grants to States· Forest Service· Other financial assistance· Aug 5, 2026 – Aug 5, 2026· 26PA11051400019

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $249.8K reported

  1. SACRAMENTO, CA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RAWINSKI LISA J$155.2K+3.4% in FY2026
    MONTE VISTA, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. J.B. LOVELACE & ASSOCIATES$136.9K−0.6% in FY2026
    COVELO, CA · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. BOISE, ID · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.