Federal contractor · RICHARDSON, TX

INTELLIEPI IR, INC

INTELLIEPI IR, INC received $250K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−91% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $9.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($250K).

Obligations · FY2026
$250K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
P3M5PR5BJG26
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 900KFY2018
  2. 650KFY2019
  3. 900KFY2020
  4. 216.5KFY2021
  5. 823KFY2022
  6. 550KFY2023
  7. 2.4MFY2024
  8. 2.9MFY2025
  9. 250KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$250K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$250K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Dallas County, TX$250K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH (SBIR) PHASE II, "FORWARD LOOKING INFRARED (FLIR) DUAL BAND FOCAL PLANE ARRAY IN HIGH DEFINITION FORMAT".$2M
    Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Research & development· May 8, 2024 – Nov 20, 2025· W5170124C0187
  2. SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) PHASE II, TOPIC A23-006, ADVANCED II-V AVALANCHE PHOTODIODE STRUCTURES IN THE INFRARED. PHI CONTRACT W909MY-24-P-0001$1.1M
    Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Research & development· May 7, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· W5170125CA126
  3. SBIR PHASE I, TOPIC NUMBER A254-032, EMERGING MATERIALS FOR CRYOGENIC OPTICAL MODULATION$250K
    Department of the Army· Dallas County, TX· Research & development· Mar 31, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026· W5170126CA011

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $68K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $30K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $246.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $344.4K reported

  1. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$175K
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  2. KBR SERVICES, LLC$169.4K
    HOUSTON, TX · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MESODYNE INC$5.8M−100% in FY2026
    SOMERVILLE, MA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. STRATIN LLC$6.2M−79% in FY2026
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  3. AROBOTICSCOMPANY, INC$4.8M+15% in FY2026
    OSSINING, NY · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.