Federal contractor · DILLINGHAM, AK

INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY, LLC

INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY, LLC received $12M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+139% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $23.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($10.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$12M
New awards
4
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JN3YF76AQLV8
Small business8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 139.2KFY2021
  2. 149.9KFY2022
  3. 928.6KFY2023
  4. 5.3MFY2024
  5. 5MFY2025
  6. 12MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$10.9M91%
  2. IT & telecom$1.1M9.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bay County, FL$797.6K6.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $12M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $12M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Dillingham Census Area, AK· Professional services· Sep 26, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· N6523625C8018
  2. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Apr 9, 2025 – May 13, 2026· M6890925P7613
  3. Department of the Army· Cumberland County, NC· IT & telecom· Mar 20, 2025 – Mar 17, 2026· W9124725CA004
  4. Department of the Air Force· Bay County, FL· Professional services· Sep 11, 2025 – May 21, 2026· FA481925C0016

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. QUANTICS INCORPORATED$12.2M−54% in FY2026
    EXTON, PA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. GNOSTECH, LLC$20.9M+108% in FY2026
    WARMINSTER, PA · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. TRIANGLE, VA · 2 entities · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.