Federal contractor · LA VERNE, CA
INTELLIGENT VAR TECHNOLOGY
INTELLIGENT VAR TECHNOLOGY received $214.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+44% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $851.6K. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($213.6K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $214.6K
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 99.5%
- UEI
- XGEYVVDUNKW5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 170KFY2023
- 318.3KFY2024
- 148.6KFY2025
- 214.6KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$213.6K99.5%4 awards
- Defense Logistics Agency$1,0040.5%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$126.1K59%
- Other equipment & supplies$88.6K41%
Where the work was performed
- Los Angeles County, CA$213.6K99.5%
- Pulaski County, MO$1,0040.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition99.5%US 39% · $213.6K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions99.5%US 8.8% · $213.6K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 22, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· N6833526F1101
- Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· N6833526LKEAPR08
- Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Dec 1, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025· N6833526LKEDEC08
- Department of the Navy· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Jan 1, 2026 – Jan 1, 2026· N6833526LKEJAN08
- Defense Logistics Agency· Pulaski County, MO· IT & telecom· May 8, 2026 – May 8, 2026· SP700026F0244
Federal grants & assistance received
Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.
INTELLIGENT VAR TECHNOLOGY received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.
- Assistance · FY2026
- $0
- New awards
- 0
- Actions
- 0
- Since FY2024
- $338.3K
Assistance by fiscal year
- 225.9KFY2024
- 112.4KFY2025
Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2025.
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $440.3K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $97.5K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $537.8K reported
- MELBOURNE, FL · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- RESOURCE POINT OF SALE LLC$573.3K−100% in FY2026CHICAGO, IL · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
- TRENTON SYSTEMS, INC.$460.5K+417% in FY2026LAWRENCEVILLE, GA · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
- ALPHA DATA INC$495.9K−91% in FY2026LITTLETON, CO · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.