Federal contractor · MUSCLE SHOALS, AL

INTERNATIONAL FERTILIZER DEVELOPMENT CENTER

No contract obligations recorded for INTERNATIONAL FERTILIZER DEVELOPMENT CENTER in FY2026. Since FY2021: $296K.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
H5JPZ3L2AKK8
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 198KFY2021
  2. 23KFY2023
  3. 75KFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for INTERNATIONAL FERTILIZER DEVELOPMENT CENTER in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

INTERNATIONAL FERTILIZER DEVELOPMENT CENTER received -$5,025 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 10.960 · Technical Agricultural Assistance (-$5,025).

Assistance · FY2026
-$5,025
New awards
0
Actions
2
Since FY2021
$130.7M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 12.9MFY2021
  2. 39.1MFY2022
  3. 59.9MFY2023
  4. 14.6MFY2024
  5. 4.2MFY2025
  6. -5KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants-$5,0250.0%

Top programs

  1. 10.960 · Technical Agricultural Assistance-$5,0250.0%

Largest awards

  1. 10.960 · Technical Agricultural Assistance· Foreign Agricultural Service· Cooperative agreement· Sep 28, 2023 – Apr 7, 2026· FX23TA-10960C035
  2. 10.960 · Technical Agricultural Assistance· Foreign Agricultural Service· Cooperative agreement· Sep 28, 2023 – May 13, 2026· FX23TA-10960C032

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $310.6K received
  • FY2022: $175.8K paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $319.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $684.4K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $93.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $175.8K reported

  1. FARM RADIO INTERNATIONAL RADIOS RURALES INTERNATIONALES$175.8K
    OTTAWA, ON · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $2.7M reported

  1. BETHESDA, MD · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC · 3 subawards
  3. EAST LANSING, MI · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. VIRTUAL TECHNOLOGY$66.7K+68% in FY2026
    RIO RICO, AZ · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. BUCHAN EDNA$59.1K−174% in FY2026
    HILO, HI · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. WAZOKU INC.$96.7K−100% in FY2026
    FRANKFORT, IL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEnvironmental Protection Agency · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.