Federal contractor · MILFORD, OH

INTERNATIONAL TECHNEGROUP INC

INTERNATIONAL TECHNEGROUP INC received $36.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−68% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($36.4K).

Obligations · FY2026
$36.4K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HABTUSA7ANL4
Parent company
WIPRO LIMITED
Other than small businessForeign-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $36.4K in FY2026 together.

  1. INTERNATIONAL TECHNEGROUP INCMILFORD, OH · Family page
    $36.4K
  2. TOPCODER, LLCINDIANAPOLIS, IN
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 109.1KFY2017
  2. 280.8KFY2018
  3. 137.7KFY2019
  4. 311.9KFY2020
  5. 290KFY2021
  6. 61.9KFY2022
  7. 50.8KFY2023
  8. 119.9KFY2024
  9. 115.3KFY2025
  10. 36.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$36.4K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$36.4K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Craven County, NC$36.4K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $36.4K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $36.4K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$36.4K
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. CADIQ SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE$36.4K
    Department of the Navy· Craven County, NC· IT & telecom· Mar 25, 2026 – May 19, 2026· N6852026P1011

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $95.2K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $125K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $334.3K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $270.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $3.2M reported

  1. KBR SERVICES, LLC$1.6M
    HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SABEL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC$687.7K
    GAINESVILLE, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC$550K
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 4 subawards · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ARAS CORPORATION$247.7K−100% in FY2026
    ANDOVER, MA · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishers
  2. SHIPCONSTRUCTOR SOFTWARE USA, INC$244.5K
    MOBILE, AL · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishers
  3. CENTURY COMPUTERS, INC$313.1K+0.2% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Software publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.