Federal contractor · BRISTOL

IOP PUBLISHING LIMITED

IOP PUBLISHING LIMITED received $1.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+0.7% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($701.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.1M
New awards
3
Sole-source
33%
Single offer
67%
UEI
MZ4NXWPAAYE5
Other than small businessForeign-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 37.7KFY2017
  2. -665FY2019
  3. 14.9KFY2020
  4. 8.7KFY2021
  5. 9KFY2022
  6. 295.9KFY2023
  7. 1.2MFY2024
  8. 1MFY2025
  9. 1.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$701.8K67%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$353.1K33%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$980.6K93%
  2. IT & telecom$74.3K7.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Greene County, OH$701.8K67%
  2. District of Columbia, DC$278.7K26%
  3. San Diego County, CA$74.3K7.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.1M
  • Sole-source awards33%
    US 30% · $353.1K
  • Single-offer competitions67%
    US 8.7% · $701.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$353.1K
    Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. IOP PUBLISHING LIMITED SUBSCRIPTION$1.4M
    Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Other equipment & supplies· Jan 24, 2025 – Dec 17, 2025· FA239625PB033
  2. IOP ONLINE SUBSCRIPTION$278.7K
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 9, 2026 – Feb 9, 2026· N0017326P2405
  3. IOP PUBLISHING MULTI-YEAR SUBSCRIPTION$74.3K
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· IT & telecom· Dec 30, 2025 – Dec 30, 2025· N6600126P6032

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $69.3K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.$69.3K100%
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $66K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $69.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $135.4K reported

  1. NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC$135.4K
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 2 subawards · Facilities support services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THE ECONOMIST NEWSPAPER, N.A INCORPORATED$2.7M−100% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Newspaper, periodical, book, and directory publishers
  2. GED TESTING SERVICE LLC$6.1M−49% in FY2026
    BLOOMINGTON, MN · 6 entities · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Newspaper, periodical, book, and directory publishersNavy · Newspaper, periodical, book, and directory publishers
  3. AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY$1.1M+26% in FY2026
    COLLEGE PARK, MD · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Newspaper, periodical, book, and directory publishersNavy · Newspaper, periodical, book, and directory publishersEnergy · Newspaper, periodical, book, and directory publishers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.