Federal contractor · WALTHAM, MA

IP TECHNOLOGY LLC

IP TECHNOLOGY LLC received $301.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 14 awards (+34% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $826.4K. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($183.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$301.8K
New awards
14
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
5.4%
UEI
JZWKRBJKZ856
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 73.3KFY2023
  2. 225.5KFY2024
  3. 225.7KFY2025
  4. 301.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 12 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Transportation & logistics$227.2K75%
  2. Education & social services$74.7K25%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition5.4%
    US 39% · $16.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions5.4%
    US 8.8% · $16.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Bergen County, NJ· Transportation & logistics· May 14, 2026 – May 14, 2026· N0018926PL115
  2. Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· Transportation & logistics· Mar 19, 2026 – Mar 19, 2026· W911SA26FA099
  3. Department of the Navy· Virginia Beach city, VA· Education & social services· Mar 31, 2026 – Mar 31, 2026· N0018926PW050
  4. Department of the Army· Hillsborough County, FL· Transportation & logistics· Feb 19, 2026 – Feb 19, 2026· W911SA26FA065
  5. Department of the Army· Orange County, CA· Transportation & logistics· Feb 25, 2026 – Feb 25, 2026· W911SA26FA080
  6. Department of the Army· Spokane County, WA· Transportation & logistics· Jan 9, 2026 – Jan 9, 2026· W911SA26FA027
  7. Department of the Army· Milwaukee County, WI· Transportation & logistics· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· W911SA26FA150
  8. Department of the Army· Jackson County, MO· Transportation & logistics· Feb 23, 2026 – Mar 9, 2026· W911SA26FA063

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PITTSBURGH, PA · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Traveler accommodationNavy · Traveler accommodationU.S. Coast Guard · Traveler accommodation
  2. EDINBURG, TX · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Traveler accommodation
  3. OLIVE RIVER CONTRACT MANAGEMENT LLC$443.5K+2,406% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Traveler accommodation

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.