Federal contractor · TROY, MI

J.D. POWER

J.D. POWER received $494.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (+11% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.7M. Its largest customer was Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management ($347.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$494.2K
New awards
5
Sole-source
17%
Single offer
74%
UEI
L2GVDQMLK641
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.9MFY2017
  2. 892.5KFY2018
  3. -697.8KFY2019
  4. 372.8KFY2020
  5. 325.6KFY2021
  6. 322KFY2022
  7. 191.2KFY2023
  8. 399.2KFY2024
  9. 445.7KFY2025
  10. 494.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$431.2K87%
  2. IT & telecom$63K13%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition91%
    US 39% · $449.2K
  • Sole-source awards17%
    US 30% · $83.9K
  • Single-offer competitions74%
    US 8.8% · $365.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 22, 2024 – May 21, 2026· 1605C524P00004
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Johnson County, KS· Professional services· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· 36C77026N0031
  3. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· Orange County, CA· Professional services· Sep 17, 2025 – May 21, 2026· 1605C525P00016
  4. Office of the Secretary· Oakland County, MI· IT & telecom· Apr 29, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· 1331L526P13210010
  5. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 14, 2026 – Sep 14, 2026· 1605C526P00012

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $150K reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BURBANK, CA · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. TELOGICAL SYSTEMS LLC$373.5K−100% in FY2026
    MANASSAS, VA · 28% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. OAKTON, VA · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.