Federal contractor · FORT WORTH, TX

JBW GROUP LLC

JBW GROUP LLC received $11.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 36 awards (−97% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $547.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($7.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$11.8M
New awards
36
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
RYENYEUPVKA8
Small business8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 43.4KFY2022
  2. 15.2MFY2023
  3. 94.5MFY2024
  4. 425.5MFY2025
  5. 11.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 8 awards
  2. 16 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 7 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 2 awards
  7. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$48.3M83%
  2. Equipment maintenance$8.2M14%
  3. Professional services$1.9M3.3%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$8.2M69%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $11.9M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $11.9M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 3 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· McDowell County, NC· Facilities & utilities· Aug 8, 2025 – May 28, 2026· W912PM25F0058
  2. Department of the Army· Harrison County, MS· Construction & real property· Dec 1, 2025 – Jun 9, 2026· W9127826CA001
  3. Department of the Army· McDowell County, NC· Facilities & utilities· Aug 12, 2025 – Apr 8, 2026· W912PM25C0032
  4. Department of the Army· Buncombe County, NC· Professional services· Jan 30, 2025 – Dec 15, 2025· W912PM25C0023
  5. Department of the Army· Arlington County, VA· Construction & real property· Jun 4, 2025 – Jan 8, 2026· W912DR25C0008
  6. Department of the Army· Clark County, NV· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2025 – Nov 14, 2025· W912DY25C0035
  7. Department of the Army· McDowell County, NC· Facilities & utilities· Apr 10, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· W912PM25F0050
  8. Department of the Army· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Nov 1, 2023 – Apr 30, 2026· W9124J24C0003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $103.7K reported

  1. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward · Services to buildings and dwellings

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 23 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PORR GOVERNMENT SERVICES GMBH$266.5M+80% in FY2026
    KAISERSLAUTERN, DEU · 7 entities · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction+1 more
  2. TMSAB LLC$170M−100% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection
  3. NAHA CITY, JPN · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.