Federal contractor · MILWAUKEE, WI

JOHNSON CONTROLS GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS, LLC

JOHNSON CONTROLS GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS, LLC received $70.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 48 awards (−33% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $990.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($42.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$70.3M
New awards
48
Sole-source
13%
Single offer
12%
UEI
RXNUR4G46NG3
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 81MFY2017
  2. 103.3MFY2018
  3. 113.5MFY2019
  4. 79.6MFY2020
  5. 82.6MFY2021
  6. 113.1MFY2022
  7. 99.8MFY2023
  8. 143.1MFY2024
  9. 104.3MFY2025
  10. 70.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 22 awards
  2. 3 awards
  3. 4 awards
  4. 3 awards
  5. 3 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 6 awards
  8. Forest Service$236.5K0.3%
    1 awards
  9. 2 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$64.3M91%
  2. Construction & real property$4.4M6.3%
  3. Facilities & utilities$1.5M2.1%
  4. Equipment maintenance$122.2K0.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. 72$6.9M9.8%
  2. United States$3.3M4.7%
  3. 66$2.4M3.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition25%
    US 39% · $17.5M
  • Sole-source awards13%
    US 30% · $9.3M
  • Single-offer competitions12%
    US 8.7% · $8.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Energy· Anderson County, TN· Construction & real property· Feb 10, 2017 – Apr 17, 2026· DEAD0508OR23367
  2. Public Buildings Service· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 31, 2021 – May 4, 2026· 47PM0721F0094
  3. Department of Energy· Milwaukee County, WI· Professional services· Dec 22, 2016 – Dec 10, 2025· DEDT0005713
  4. Department of the Army· Professional services· Oct 7, 2016 – May 8, 2026· 0003
  5. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Nov 4, 2016 – May 15, 2026· 0014
  6. Department of the Army· Professional services· Sep 30, 2017 – Mar 19, 2026· W912DY17F0308
  7. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Nov 4, 2016 – May 8, 2026· 0010
  8. Department of the Army· Liberty County, GA· Construction & real property· Jun 14, 2017 – May 13, 2026· W9124M10F0027

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $42.5M (8 subawards)

6 sub-recipients

  1. DURHAM, NC · 2 subawards
  2. KNOXVILLE, TN · 2 subawards
  3. COLUMBIA, MD · 1 subaward
  4. ONIX II, INC.$134.5K0.3%
    EMPORIUM, PA · 1 subaward
  5. LYNN HAVEN, FL · 1 subaward
  6. AQUALOGIX LLC$85K0.2%
    PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $764.4K (3 subawards)

2 primes

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  2. NEWPORT NEWS, VA · 2 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 60% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $35.5M paid out · $868K received
  • FY2022: $770K paid out · $13.8M received
  • FY2023: $9M paid out · $2.2M received
  • FY2024: $157.4K paid out · $4.8M received
  • FY2025: $197.9K paid out · $3.3M received
  • FY2026: $42.5M paid out · $764.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

20 companies · $88.1M reported

  1. WAKE FOREST, NC · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. LIGHTING RETROFIT INTERNATIONAL, LLC$15.9M
    GAMBRILLS, MD · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC.$6.3M
    COLUMBIA, MO · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $25.8M reported

  1. FREDERICK, MD · 32 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. NEWPORT NEWS, VA · 23 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 22 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SOUTHWEST RANGE SERVICES LLC$175.7M−40% in FY2026
    LAS CRUCES, NM · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. DIGIFLIGHT INCORPORATED$183.5M−23% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. OVERLAND PARK, KS · 2 entities · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.