Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

JOINT TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC

JOINT TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC received $67.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−45% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $253.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($67.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$67.1M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UDK4EL8FFGD4
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 250KFY2023
  2. 64.3MFY2024
  3. 121.6MFY2025
  4. 67.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$67.1M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$67.1M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Madison County, AL$67.1M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. REDSTONE TEST AND ENGINEERING SERVICES$121.4M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Feb 25, 2025 – May 14, 2026· W91CRB25F0119
  2. REDSTONE TEST AND ENGINEERING SERVICES - TASK ORDER YEAR 3.$88.3M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Feb 24, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· W91CRB26FA082
  3. AWARD OF YEAR ONE (1) TASK ORDER FOR REDSTONE TEST AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES AT RTC. INCLUDES LABOR AND ODCS.$81.2M
    Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Feb 7, 2024 – Feb 19, 2026· W91CRB24F0094

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $8.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $5.3M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

71 companies · $13.8M reported

  1. CURTISS-WRIGHT DS, INC.$3.3M
    NEWTOWN, PA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. MAROTTA CONTROLS INC$1.2M
    MONTVILLE, NJ · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. GAN CORPORATION$674.6K
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. QED SYSTEMS, LLC$215.3M−39% in FY2026
    ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. MAG DS CORP$351.9M−33% in FY2026
    TINTON FALLS, NJ · 4 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. FIBERTEK, INC.$198.3M+9.4% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.