Federal contractor · DAVIS, CA

JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING, LLC

JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING, LLC received $100K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+400% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $744.5K. Its largest customer was Offices, Boards and Divisions ($100K).

Obligations · FY2026
$100K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WTN1GMU7FVG9
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 199.6KFY2022
  2. 199.9KFY2023
  3. 225KFY2024
  4. 20KFY2025
  5. 100KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$100K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $100K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $100K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Justice · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Offices, Boards and Divisions· Yolo County, CA· Professional services· Aug 17, 2026 – Aug 17, 2026· 15JPSS26P00000464

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $290.7K (5 subawards)

2 primes

  1. BLUE BELL, PA · 4 subawards
  2. DENVER, CO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $132.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $248.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $442.2K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $296.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $326.5K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $290.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.7M reported

  1. BLUE BELL, PA · 12 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. FAIRFAX, VA · 10 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. DENVER, CO · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BELLEVUE, WA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffices, Boards and Divisions · Legal services
  2. SACRAMENTO, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffices, Boards and Divisions · Legal services
  3. DOAR, INC.$337.8K
    NEW YORK, NY · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffices, Boards and Divisions · Legal services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.