Federal contractor · TOPEKA, KS

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS

No contract obligations recorded for KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS in FY2026. Since FY2017: $2.7M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($0). It also received $23.1M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
ZE2AFV6P8MY3
Parent company
KANSAS STATE OF
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 248.3KFY2017
  2. 332.3KFY2018
  3. 323.2KFY2019
  4. 429KFY2020
  5. 237.3KFY2021
  6. 295.6KFY2022
  7. 371.4KFY2023
  8. 286.5KFY2024
  9. 149KFY2025
  10. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Shawnee County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2024 – Dec 22, 2025· W912DQ24F1025

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS received $23.1M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 110 actions (23 new awards), −26% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 15.611 · Wildlife Restoration and Basic Hunter Education and Safety ($17.2M).

Assistance · FY2026
$23.1M
New awards
23
Actions
110
Since FY2021
$161.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 19.5MFY2021
  2. 31MFY2022
  3. 21.8MFY2023
  4. 34.8MFY2024
  5. 31.4MFY2025
  6. 23.1MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$23.1M100%

Top programs

  1. 15.611 · Wildlife Restoration and Basic Hunter Education and Safety$17.2M75%
  2. 15.605 · Sport Fish Restoration$4.2M18%
  3. 97.012 · Boating Safety Financial Assistance$944.6K4.1%
  4. 15.608 · Fish and Aquatic Conservation - Aquatic Invasive Species$881K3.8%
  5. 15.634 · State Wildlife Grants$346K1.5%
  6. 15.684 · White-Nose Syndrome National Response Implementation$41.7K0.2%
  7. 15.615 · Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund-$2,9190.0%
  8. 16.835 · Body Worn Camera Policy and Implementation-$31.1K0.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of the Interior
  2. U.S. Coast Guard$944.6K4.1%
    Department of Homeland Security

Largest awards

  1. 15.611 · Wildlife Restoration and Basic Hunter Education and Safety· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Grant· Apr 20, 2026 – Apr 20, 2026· F26AF00713
  2. 15.611 · Wildlife Restoration and Basic Hunter Education and Safety· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Grant· Aug 6, 2021 – Jul 21, 2026· F18AF01115
  3. 15.611 · Wildlife Restoration and Basic Hunter Education and Safety· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Grant· Sep 19, 2024 – Sep 29, 2026· F24AF03213
  4. 15.615 · Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Grant· Jun 27, 2024 – Apr 7, 2026· F24AP01901
  5. 15.611 · Wildlife Restoration and Basic Hunter Education and Safety· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Grant· Aug 18, 2023 – Jul 15, 2026· F23AF02698
  6. 15.611 · Wildlife Restoration and Basic Hunter Education and Safety· U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Grant· May 15, 2026 – May 15, 2026· F26AF00754

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $644.7K (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. KANSAS ALLIANCE FOR WETLANDS AND STREAMS INC$409.5K64%
    NEWTON, KS · 1 subaward
  2. MANHATTAN, KS · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $937.5K (5 subawards)

1 prime

  1. KANSAS ADJUTANT GENERAL DEPARTMENT$937.5K100%
    TOPEKA, KS · 5 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $670.3K paid out · $268.9K received
  • FY2022: $1.6M paid out · $150K received
  • FY2023: $2.5M paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2024: $354.3K paid out · $854.7K received
  • FY2025: $2.6M paid out · $2.8M received
  • FY2026: $644.7K paid out · $937.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

9 companies · $8.4M reported

  1. MANHATTAN, KS · 7 subawards
  2. ATHENS, GA · 1 subaward
  3. LAWRENCE, KS · 2 subawards

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $6.2M reported

  1. KANSAS ADJUTANT GENERAL DEPARTMENT$5.4M
    TOPEKA, KS · 29 subawards
  2. TOPEKA, KS · 3 subawards
  3. BISMARCK, ND · 2 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EDINA, MN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Administration of environmental quality programs
  2. HELENA, MT · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Administration of environmental quality programs
  3. JEFFERSON CITY, MO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Administration of environmental quality programs

Showing the top 3 of 12 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.