Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

KATMAI TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC

KATMAI TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC received $14.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 12 awards (−41% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $294M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($12.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.5M
New awards
12
Sole-source
58%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GERMM3L4D261
Parent company
KATMAI TECHNICAL SERVICES LLC
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $14.5M in FY2026 together.

  1. KATMAI TECHNICAL SERVICES, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $14.5M
  2. KATMAI TECHNICAL SERVICES LLCBELLEVUE, NE
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 33.5MFY2017
  2. 38.2MFY2018
  3. 20MFY2019
  4. 34.3MFY2020
  5. 30.1MFY2021
  6. 35.2MFY2022
  7. 36.7MFY2023
  8. 26.6MFY2024
  9. 24.8MFY2025
  10. 14.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$12.7M88%
    8 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$1.1M7.3%
    2 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force$711.2K4.9%
    1 awards
  4. Defense Logistics Agency$30.7K0.2%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$11.1M76%
  2. Professional services$2.7M19%
  3. IT & telecom$711.2K4.9%

Where the work was performed

  1. Warren County, MS$6.4M44%
  2. Bell County, TX$6.1M42%
  3. Orleans Parish, LA$1.1M7.6%
  4. Anchorage Municipality, AK$502.9K3.5%
  5. Kodiak Island Borough, AK$285.2K2.0%
  6. Sarpy County, NE$239K1.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition58%
    US 39% · $8.5M
  • Sole-source awards58%
    US 30% · $8.5M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$6.6M
    Department of Defense · 5 awards

Largest awards

  1. RANGE OPERATIONS FOR DIRECTORATE OF PLANS, TRAINING, MOBILIZATION AND SECURITY AT FORT HOOD, TEXAS.$40.6M
    Department of the Army· Bell County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Mar 15, 2022 – May 18, 2026· W9115122C0007
  2. THE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT IS TO: 1. EXTEND CLOSING DATE TO ALLOW FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS DUE TO A SEAPORT SYSTEM TECHNICAL ISSUE.$18.6M
    Department of the Navy· San Bernardino County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Dec 4, 2019 – Mar 17, 2026· M6785420F3005
  3. !8504783809!AF FUELS MANAGEM$8M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Facilities & utilities· Sep 28, 2017 – Jan 8, 2026· SPE60017C5033
  4. JALIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES$4.3M
    Department of the Navy· Orleans Parish, LA· Professional services· May 25, 2023 – May 19, 2026· N0003923C1003
  5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PERSONNEL, SUPERVISION, AND SERVICES NECESSARY TO PERFORM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT TASKS FOR THE ERDC AS DEFINED IN THIS PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT OF WORK (PWS).$3.8M
    Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Jun 11, 2026 – Jun 11, 2026· W912HZ26FA113
  6. TECHNICAL ANALYST II$3.4M
    Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Professional services· Jun 30, 2025 – May 19, 2026· W912HZ25F0218
  7. DEFENSIVE DATA VALIDATION TOOLKIT 3 (DDVT3). AGILE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.$2.4M
    Department of the Air Force· Anchorage Municipality, AK· IT & telecom· Aug 31, 2022 – May 14, 2026· FA873022C8508
  8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL PERSONNEL, SUPERVISION, AND SERVICES NECESSARY TO PERFORM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING AND SUPPORT TASKS FOR THE ERDC AS DEFINED IN THIS PERFORMANCE BASED STATEMENT OF WORK (PBSOW).$1.2M
    Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Jun 12, 2026 – Jun 12, 2026· W912HZ26FA096

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $1.3M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $1.3M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $2.6M reported

  1. IMAGINE BELIEVE REALIZE LLC$2.6M
    ROCKLEDGE, FL · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PD SYSTEMS, LLC$43.2M+43% in FY2026
    SPRINGFIELD, VA · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support servicesArmy · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. SHEARWATER MISSION SUPPORT, LLC$27.8M−72% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 2 entities · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services
  3. EAST O&M, LLC$26.6M−33% in FY2026
    GAINESVILLE, VA · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.