Federal contractor · LOGAN, UT

KELLER-BLIESNER ENGINEERING, LLC

KELLER-BLIESNER ENGINEERING, LLC received $208.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−7.8% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.5M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education ($208.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$208.3K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
GRN1VMZ7E9Q9
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 340.3KFY2017
  2. 755.6KFY2018
  3. 302.7KFY2019
  4. 419.9KFY2020
  5. 306.4KFY2021
  6. 1.2MFY2022
  7. 236.9KFY2023
  8. 1.5MFY2024
  9. 225.9KFY2025
  10. 208.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education$208.3K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$208.3K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Cache County, UT$208.3K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $208.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $208.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. FY2022 TECH. SUPPORT SVCS-ENVIRON. COMPL$845.9K
    Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Cache County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Sep 24, 2021 – Jun 3, 2026· 140A0921F0030
  2. TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICE-NIIP, BIA, NRO, ENGINEERING SERVICES$484K
    Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Cache County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 27, 2025 – Sep 3, 2026· 140A0925F0017

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TALAS ENGINEERING, INC.$1.1M−11% in FY2026
    HAYWARD, CA · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffices, Boards and Divisions · Legal services
  2. BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A.$1.2M+52% in FY2026
    FORT LAUDERDALE, FL · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffices, Boards and Divisions · Legal services
  3. LAKIND ASSOCIATES, LLC$1.2M−50% in FY2026
    CATONSVILLE, MD · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffices, Boards and Divisions · Legal services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.