Federal contractor · HOUSTON, TX

KIRBY INLAND MARINE, LP

No contract obligations recorded for KIRBY INLAND MARINE, LP in FY2026. Since FY2023: $4,649.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
C7LDAD8CLHC5
Parent company
KIRBY CORPORATION
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ENGINE SYSTEMS, INC. company family: 5 registered entities, $26.8K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ENGINE SYSTEMS, INC.ROCKY MOUNT, NC · Family page
    $0
  2. $26.8K
  3. $0
  4. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.6KFY2023
  2. 0FY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for KIRBY INLAND MARINE, LP in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $5.8M reported

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 72 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 3 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. GREENVILLE, SC · 7 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MENTOR, OH · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Engine, turbine, and power transmission equipment manufacturing
  2. COGITIC CORPORATION$8.2M−74% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Engine, turbine, and power transmission equipment manufacturingNavy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+1 more
  3. KOCSIS TECHNOLOGIES INC$2.9M−117% in FY2026
    ALSIP, IL · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Engine, turbine, and power transmission equipment manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.