Federal contractor · MAGAZINE, AR

KMA HOLDINGS LLC

KMA HOLDINGS LLC received $141.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+50% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($141.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$141.3K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LAKLJ981VQQ4
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 659.1KFY2017
  2. 358.1KFY2018
  3. 582KFY2019
  4. 584.9KFY2020
  5. 109.1KFY2021
  6. -40.5KFY2022
  7. 192.7KFY2023
  8. 199.5KFY2024
  9. 94.4KFY2025
  10. 141.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$141.3K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$141.3K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Baxter County, AR$156.6K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MH 23D0018 KMA OY3 TASK ORDER FOR WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT SERVICES$156.6K
    Department of the Army· Baxter County, AR· Facilities & utilities· May 28, 2026 – May 28, 2026· W9127S26FA100
  2. PRE-PRICED TASK ORDER UNDER IDIQ GENERAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES CONTRACT FOR RUSSELLVILLE SITE OFFICE (DARDANELLE), MKARNS PROJECT.$122.6K
    Department of the Army· Pope County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Jul 30, 2024 – Nov 20, 2025· W9127S24F0126

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THOMAS, RICKY$368.2K−24% in FY2026
    HORATIO, AR · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellingsArmy · Facilities support services
  2. REEVES, MELISSA$303.6K−52% in FY2026
    KIRBYVILLE, TX · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellingsArmy · Facilities support services
  3. NUOVA ELETTRICA S.R.L.$479.1K+1,862% in FY2026
    SAN DONA DI PIAVE, ITA · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellingsArmy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.