Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

KOMAN INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, LLC

KOMAN INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, LLC received $2.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−20% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $39.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($2.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2.2M
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MTZ9W1XKN6U4
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $2.2M in FY2026 together.

  1. KOMAN INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, LLCANCHORAGE, AK · Family page
    $2.2M
  2. $0
  3. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 132.1KFY2020
  2. 17.1MFY2022
  3. 908.9KFY2023
  4. 16.8MFY2024
  5. 2.7MFY2025
  6. 2.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$2.2M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $2.2M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $2.2M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Cochise County, AZ· Construction & real property· Sep 29, 2024 – Nov 20, 2025· W912PL24C0035
  2. Department of the Air Force· Kern County, CA· Construction & real property· Mar 3, 2026 – Mar 3, 2026· FA930126F0069
  3. Department of the Air Force· Kern County, CA· Construction & real property· Mar 3, 2026 – Mar 3, 2026· FA930126F0066

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $20.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $1.7M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $880K paid out · $1.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

17 companies · $22.7M reported

  1. LEMOORE, CA · 2 subawards · Utility system construction
  2. ARROYO GRANDE, CA · 2 subawards · Utility system construction
  3. MEC INC$1.3M
    EDWARDS, CA · 12 subawards · Other specialty trade contractors

Primes that pay it

1 company · $8.5M reported

  1. ANCHORAGE, AK · 7 subawards · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DOTHAN, AL · 60% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Highway, street, and bridge construction
  2. ROBERT J. CUMMINS$12.9M−100% in FY2026
    BRADFORD, PA · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Highway, street, and bridge construction
  3. SOUTHERN-RC-JV-01 LLC$12.7M−97% in FY2026
    NEWBERN, TN · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Highway, street, and bridge construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.