Federal contractor · SAN MARCOS, CA

KROS-WISE

KROS-WISE received $800 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−98% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $89.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($800).

Obligations · FY2026
$800
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
Q7AEGK376EE3
Parent company
KROS WISE INC
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 12.8MFY2017
  2. 17.2MFY2018
  3. 14.9MFY2019
  4. 8.9MFY2020
  5. 11MFY2021
  6. 10.5MFY2022
  7. 8.9MFY2023
  8. 5.8MFY2024
  9. 46KFY2025
  10. 800FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$800100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$800100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Riverside County, CA$800100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THIS TASK ORDER SHALL PROVIDE IT AND CYBER SECURITY SERVICES FOR THE IT DIVISION WITHIN THE NSWC CORONA DIVISION, CORPORATE OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT.$17.9M
    Department of the Navy· Riverside County, CA· Professional services· Jun 8, 2018 – Mar 31, 2026· N6426718F3008

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $799.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $5.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $130.3K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.5M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $41.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $8.4M reported

  1. EPSILON SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS INC$5.7M
    PORTSMOUTH, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$2.2M
    MCLEAN, VA · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RIVET OPERATIONS COMPANY LLC$317K
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CUTLER ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LLC$6M−4.9% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. THE MARLIN ALLIANCE, INC.$6.1M
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MK ENGINEERS, LTD.$6.8M+3.8% in FY2026
    MILILANI, HI · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.