Federal contractor · ORLANDO, FL

KUPONO GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC

KUPONO GOVERNMENT SERVICES, LLC received $18.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−58% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $358.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($7.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$18.1M
New awards
5
Sole-source
82%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
PZAMGK8HM3W5
Other than small business8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -282.4KFY2017
  2. 15.9MFY2018
  3. 33.1MFY2019
  4. 36.5MFY2020
  5. 43.1MFY2021
  6. 53.1MFY2022
  7. 54.9MFY2023
  8. 60.7MFY2024
  9. 43.5MFY2025
  10. 18.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$7.2M40%
  2. IT & telecom$5.9M33%
  3. Professional services$3.3M18%
  4. Equipment maintenance$1.5M8.1%
  5. Other equipment & supplies$166.2K0.9%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition82%
    US 39% · $14.8M
  • Sole-source awards82%
    US 30% · $14.8M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Newport News city, VA· IT & telecom· Mar 12, 2021 – Mar 18, 2026· W91RUS21C0009
  2. Department of the Air Force· Maui County, HI· Facilities & utilities· Mar 31, 2023 – Apr 20, 2026· FA521523C0003
  3. Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 31, 2022 – Jun 2, 2026· N0003922F3014
  4. Missile Defense Agency· Honolulu County, HI· Equipment maintenance· Nov 17, 2022 – Apr 22, 2026· HQ085123C0001
  5. Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· May 27, 2025 – Apr 8, 2026· N6134025F0100

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $1.1M reported

  1. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ALTUS TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC$44.4M−12% in FY2026
    HANOVER, MD · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. KIKAHA SOLUTIONS, LLC$72.6M+42% in FY2026
    ORLANDO, FL · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more
  3. AT2, LLC$43.8M−30% in FY2026
    SEVERN, MD · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.