Federal contractor · NAKAGAMI-GUN
KYOWA TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD.
KYOWA TECHNOLOGIES CO.,LTD. received $37.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (−95% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $21M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($37.8K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $37.8K
- New awards
- 9
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- M52SM1PDURX6
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 3.3MFY2017
- 1.6MFY2018
- 1.5MFY2019
- 4.2MFY2020
- 3.8MFY2021
- 2.2MFY2022
- 1.1MFY2023
- 2.5MFY2024
- 764.9KFY2025
- 37.8KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$37.8K100%6 awards
- Department of the Army$00.0%3 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$37.8K100%
Where the work was performed
- Abroad$37.8K100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $29.6K received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · -$182.7K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- SEA-TECH ADVANCED RESTORATION SOLUTIONS$5.2M−7.3% in FY2026RICHLAND, WA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- TOLAND & MIZELL ARCHITECTS, INC.$5M−92% in FY2026ATLANTA, GA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- GVI INC$2.1M+576% in FY2026NORFOLK, VA · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.