Federal contractor · MARYSVILLE, WA

LAMAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC

LAMAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $118.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−57% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.1M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($118.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$118.5K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
6.4%
UEI
CGDTVMNWG878
Parent company
LAMAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 239.7KFY2017
  2. 351.3KFY2018
  3. 127.8KFY2019
  4. 180KFY2020
  5. 140.8KFY2021
  6. 272.1KFY2022
  7. 235.2KFY2023
  8. 186.4KFY2024
  9. 274.1KFY2025
  10. 118.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$118.5K100%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$118.5K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Snohomish County, WA$118.5K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition6.4%
    US 39% · $7,545
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions6.4%
    US 8.8% · $7,545
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. 8511724868!CONDITIONER,CHARGER$84.7K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Snohomish County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 27, 2025 – Oct 27, 2025· SPE7L726V0105
  2. 8511901351!RELAY ASSEMBLY$22.5K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Snohomish County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 4, 2026 – Mar 4, 2026· SPE7M326P0602
  3. 8511706612!ELECTRONIC MODULE,S$7,545
    Defense Logistics Agency· Snohomish County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 16, 2025 – Oct 16, 2025· SPE7M526V0442
  4. 8511805668!NRP,SYSTEM MONITOR$3,645
    Defense Logistics Agency· Snohomish County, WA· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 10, 2025 – Dec 10, 2025· SPE7M126V3584

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $31.2K reported

  1. BELL TEXTRON INC$31.2K
    FORT WORTH, TX · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CIRCUIT SYSTEMS CO INC$316K−32% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, TX · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Electrical equipment manufacturing
  2. COAST/ADVANCED CHIP MAGNETICS, INC.$270.4K−46% in FY2026
    TORRANCE, CA · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Electrical equipment manufacturing
  3. INFINITE ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC$313.6K−23% in FY2026
    HAYDEN, ID · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Building material and supplies dealers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.