Federal contractor · PAYSON, AZ
LAP CONTRACTING INC
LAP CONTRACTING INC received $2.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 26 awards (+51% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $16.8M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($2.2M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2.2M
- New awards
- 26
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 100%
- UEI
- CNWAJAFD1QZ9
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 475.2KFY2017
- 405.1KFY2018
- 500.4KFY2019
- 1.3MFY2020
- 978.6KFY2021
- 3.6MFY2022
- 2.6MFY2023
- 3.3MFY2024
- 1.5MFY2025
- 2.2MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Forest Service$2.2M100%26 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$2.2M100%
Where the work was performed
- Coconino County, AZ$558.1K25%
- Maricopa County, AZ$480.2K22%
- Montrose County, CO$445K20%
- Otero County, NM$184.2K8.3%
- Richland County, SC$157.6K7.1%
- La Plata County, CO$154.1K6.9%
- Pueblo County, CO$77.2K3.5%
- Bernalillo County, NM$51.1K2.3%
- Leon County, FL$43.8K2.0%
- Santa Fe County, NM$37.2K1.7%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $2.2M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions100%US 8.8% · $2.2M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Forest Service· Coconino County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jun 20, 2026 – Jun 20, 2026· 1202SB26M1034
- Forest Service· Montrose County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 13, 2026 – Jul 13, 2026· 1202SB26M1994
- Forest Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jun 20, 2026 – Jul 8, 2026· 1202SB26M0724
- Forest Service· Richland County, SC· Facilities & utilities· Mar 14, 2026 – Mar 14, 2026· 1202SB26M0213
- Forest Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jun 20, 2026 – Jun 20, 2026· 1202SB26M3177
- Forest Service· Otero County, NM· Facilities & utilities· May 17, 2026 – May 17, 2026· 1202SB26M0507
- Forest Service· La Plata County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 11, 2026 – Jul 11, 2026· 1202SB26M1911
- Forest Service· Montrose County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 18, 2026 – Jul 18, 2026· 1202SB26M1857
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- TRI CITIES FORESTRY LLC$6.4M−52% in FY2026PROSSER, WA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
- VM WEST LLC$6.6M+69% in FY2026DELTA, CO · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental and leasing
- SIERRA FOREST PRODUCTS$6.3M+269% in FY2026TERRA BELLA, CA · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.