Federal contractor · CHARLOTTE, NC
LEAD TECHNOLOGIES, INC
LEAD TECHNOLOGIES, INC received $100.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+205% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.8M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($100.7K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $100.7K
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 17%
- Single offer
- 7.0%
- UEI
- VQZ6MLEJFK23
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.6MFY2017
- 1.2MFY2018
- 1.3MFY2019
- 1.3MFY2020
- 1.1MFY2021
- 1.3MFY2022
- 814.4KFY2023
- 1MFY2024
- 33KFY2025
- 100.7KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of Veterans Affairs$100.7K100%7 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Equipment maintenance$119.3K91%
- IT & telecom$12.3K9.3%
Where the work was performed
- Milwaukee County, WI$102.3K100%
- Denver County, CO$12.3K12%
- Bell County, TX$7,0407.0%
- Essex County, NJ$5,4845.4%
- Pima County, AZ$4,5034.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition24%US 39% · $23.7K
- Sole-source awards17%US 30% · $16.6K
- Single-offer competitions7.0%US 8.8% · $7,040
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Milwaukee County, WI· Equipment maintenance· Jun 16, 2022 – Jul 10, 2026· 36C25222P0754
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Denver County, CO· IT & telecom· May 31, 2024 – May 20, 2026· 36C25624P1139
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Bell County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Mar 6, 2024 – Mar 11, 2026· 36C25724F0077
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Mecklenburg County, NC· Health & medical· Sep 27, 2022 – Mar 13, 2026· 36C24622P1918
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Pima County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Feb 3, 2023 – May 29, 2026· 36C26223P0721
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Essex County, NJ· Equipment maintenance· Oct 19, 2021 – Oct 1, 2025· 36C24222P0073
- MIPACS UPGRADES$7,800Department of Veterans Affairs· Suffolk County, MA· Health & medical· Jul 25, 2024 – Oct 7, 2025· 36C24124N1048
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $35.5K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $668K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.9M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $35.5K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $35.5K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
2 companies · $3.7M reported
- LEIDOS, INC.$3.5MRESTON, VA · 3 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
- CHANTILLY, VA · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- NETSMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$508.6K+42% in FY2026OVERLAND PARK, KS · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related servicesVeterans Affairs · Electronic and precision equipment repair and maintenanceVeterans Affairs · Software publishers+1 more
- WENZEL AMERICA LTD.$357.3KWIXOM, MI · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
- APOTHEM, INC.$341.9K−100% in FY2026LANDRUM, SC · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.