Federal contractor · NAPERVILLE, IL

LEARNING POINT ASSOCIATES

No contract obligations recorded for LEARNING POINT ASSOCIATES in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026: $0
New awards: 0
Sole-source: —
Single offer: —

UEI: HLK3HG8Y69T9
Parent company: AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Other than small businessNonprofit

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES company family: 2 registered entities, $96.1M in FY2026 together. See the family

AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCESARLINGTON, VA · Family page
Reported parent$96.1M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

0FY2017

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for LEARNING POINT ASSOCIATES in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

221 companies · $1.3B reported

VITALUS TECHNOLOGIES INC$540.2M
NEWARK, DE · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
WESTED$485.5M
SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 11 subawards · Scientific research and development services
PHASE2 TECHNOLOGY, LLC$28.8M
ARLINGTON, VA · 3 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Primes that pay it

55 companies · $93.9M reported

TX EDUCATION AGENCY$13.8M
AUSTIN, TX · 14 subawards
WESTED$9.5M
SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 10 subawards · Educational support services
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE$8.8M
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC · 8 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 26 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

ACUMEN LLC$262.7M−14% in FY2026
BURLINGAME, CA · 40% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Scientific research and development servicesHealth Resources and Services Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services+1 more
MATHEMATICA INC.$644.4M+41% in FY2026
PRINCETON, NJ · 2 entities · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Scientific research and development servicesCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesHealth Resources and Services Administration · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services+7 more
EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE$172.9M−24% in FY2026
PRINCETON, NJ · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveEducation · Scientific research and development servicesEducation · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH IN THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

American Institutes for ResearchAI match · 100%
American Institutes for Research (AIR)AI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2025: $190K; 7 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026: $480K

Lobbying by year

2023$180K
5 reports
2024$70K
2 reports
2025$190K
7 reports
2026$40K
2 reports

Top issues

Budget and appropriations14 reports
Education14 reports
Labor issues, antitrust and workplace5 reports
Foreign relations3 reports
Medicare and Medicaid2 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
U.S. SENATE14 reports
Education - Dept of6 reports
Labor - Dept of (DOL)3 reports
Health & Human Services - Dept of (HHS)2 reports
Office of Management & Budget (OMB)2 reports
Executive Office of the President (EOP)1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

THE 51 GROUP, LLC$230K
5 reports
LODESTONE DC$170K
6 reports
Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$60K
3 reports
McGuireWoods Consulting (A Subsidiary of McGuireWoods LLP)$20K
2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 5894 · Making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, and for other purposes.3 reports
118th Congress · Introduced · 2023–2024
S. 2624 · Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 20243 reports
118th Congress · Reported by committee · 2023–2024
H.R. 1968 · Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 20252 reports
119th Congress · Became law · 2025

5 of 16 reports (2023–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.