Federal contractor · OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

LIBERTY DISPOSAL INC

LIBERTY DISPOSAL INC received $928K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−0.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $9.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($694.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$928K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EEHBA2XNK467
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.2MFY2017
  2. 2.2MFY2018
  3. 334.6KFY2019
  4. 1.1MFY2020
  5. 2.5KFY2021
  6. 801.8KFY2022
  7. 496.3KFY2023
  8. 777KFY2024
  9. 936.4KFY2025
  10. 928KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$928K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Pima County, AZ$165.8K18%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Leavenworth County, KS· Facilities & utilities· Mar 2, 2023 – Jun 2, 2026· W91QF423P0010
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs· Pima County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Oct 1, 2024 – May 26, 2026· 36C26225C0023
  3. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Oct 20, 2025 – May 28, 2026· 15B51326F00000003
  4. Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Oct 28, 2024 – Oct 14, 2025· 15B51325F00000018
  5. Bureau of Land Management· Cochise County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 24, 2024 – Dec 2, 2025· 140L6424P0063

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COMUNE DI PISA$2.2M−100% in FY2026
    PISA, ITA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection
  3. CITY OF MONTEREY$2.6M−6.5% in FY2026
    MONTEREY, CA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.