Federal contractor · DFW AIRPORT, TX

LIFE SCIENCE LOGISTICS LLC

LIFE SCIENCE LOGISTICS LLC received $40.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+169% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $714M. Its largest customer was Federal Acquisition Service ($40.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$40.9M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
32%
UEI
JM2QVRETXLX1
Parent company
LIFE SCIENCE LOGISTICS, LLC
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $40.9M in FY2026 together.

  1. LIFE SCIENCE LOGISTICS LLCDFW AIRPORT, TX · Family page
    $40.9M
  2. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 95.9MFY2017
  2. 23.9MFY2018
  3. 24.1MFY2019
  4. 59.3MFY2020
  5. 99.8MFY2021
  6. 186.1MFY2022
  7. 105.1MFY2023
  8. 63.7MFY2024
  9. 15.2MFY2025
  10. 40.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$40.9M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition30%
    US 39% · $12.2M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$800K
  • Single-offer competitions32%
    US 8.7% · $13M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · -$800K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Acquisition Service· Dallas County, TX· Professional services· Nov 5, 2021 – Aug 21, 2026· 47QFCA22C0003
  2. Federal Acquisition Service· Pierce County, WA· Professional services· Mar 17, 2021 – Aug 19, 2026· 47QFCA21C0010
  3. Federal Acquisition Service· Fulton County, GA· Professional services· Oct 4, 2022 – Aug 31, 2026· 47QFCA23C0001
  4. Federal Acquisition Service· DeKalb County, GA· Professional services· Dec 14, 2021 – Sep 28, 2026· 47QFCA22C0006
  5. Federal Acquisition Service· Boone County, IN· Professional services· Nov 18, 2019 – Aug 26, 2026· 47QFCA20C0002
  6. Federal Acquisition Service· DeKalb County, GA· Professional services· Mar 24, 2022 – Dec 30, 2025· 47QFCA22C0007

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $365K reported

  1. INDIANAPOLIS, IN · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. METRO LOGICS INC$79.6M+67% in FY2026
    OLIVE BRANCH, MS · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Warehousing and storage
  2. INTEGRATED QUALITY SOLUTIONS, LLC$242.6M+747% in FY2026
    MEMPHIS, TN · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Warehousing and storage
  3. M-80 SYSTEMS, INC.$29.1M−11% in FY2026
    ASAN, GU · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Warehousing and storage

Showing the top 3 of 10 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of LIFE SCIENCE LOGISTICS LLC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Life Science Logistics, LLCAI match · 100%
  • LifeScience LogisticsAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$640K
15 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.6M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$190K
    9 reports
  2. 2024$525K
    16 reports
  3. 2025$640K
    15 reports
  4. 2026$260K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Medical and disease research, clinical labs23 reports
  2. Health issues20 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations15 reports
  4. Disaster planning and emergencies7 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES22 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE22 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Crossroads Strategies, LLC$630K
    13 reports
  2. BALLARD PARTNERS$510K
    7 reports
  3. The Conafay Group, LLC$230K
    7 reports
  4. Sidley Austin LLP$185K
    6 reports
  5. Williams and Jensen, PLLC$60K
    2 reports
  6. Greenberg Traurig, LLP$0
    9 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.