Federal contractor · TUCSON, AZ
LINE AND SPACE, LLC
LINE AND SPACE, LLC received $559.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−59% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $20.2M. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($559.1K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $559.1K
- New awards
- 10
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- KA9MD9NFJJZ8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.5MFY2017
- 1.4MFY2018
- 1.6MFY2019
- 706.6KFY2020
- 2.2MFY2021
- 2MFY2022
- 5.3MFY2023
- 3.5MFY2024
- 1.4MFY2025
- 559.1KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Public Buildings Service$559.1K100%10 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$559.1K100%
Where the work was performed
- Pima County, AZ$578.4K100%
- Clark County, NV$53.4K9.6%
- Maricopa County, AZ$18.3K3.3%
- Imperial County, CA$6,4661.2%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Public Buildings Service· Pima County, AZ· Construction & real property· Feb 7, 2023 – Jun 29, 2026· 47PK0123F0002
- Public Buildings Service· Pima County, AZ· Construction & real property· Dec 4, 2024 – Aug 19, 2026· 47PK1725F0005
- Public Buildings Service· Imperial County, CA· Construction & real property· Jan 6, 2021 – May 26, 2026· 47PK0121F0005
- Public Buildings Service· Imperial County, CA· Construction & real property· Jun 10, 2025 – Apr 2, 2026· 47PK0125F0011
- Public Buildings Service· Maricopa County, AZ· Construction & real property· Oct 5, 2023 – Feb 26, 2026· 47PK1724F0001
- Public Buildings Service· Pima County, AZ· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2024 – Aug 25, 2026· 47PK1724F0041
- Public Buildings Service· Clark County, NV· Construction & real property· May 16, 2024 – Sep 3, 2026· 47PK1724F0018
- Public Buildings Service· Pima County, AZ· Construction & real property· Jul 24, 2024 – Dec 23, 2025· 47PK0124F0016
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $449.3K paid out · $449.3K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $35.8K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
1 company · $35.8K reported
- DENVER, CO · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- LIOLLIO HARTMAN COX JV, LLC$5.3M+26% in FY2026CHARLESTON, SC · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- RICHTER ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS INC$5.7M+32% in FY2026CORPUS CHRISTI, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- MICHAEL MALTZAN ARCHITECTURE, INCORPORATED$5.1M−94% in FY2026LOS ANGELES, CA · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.