Federal contractor · MCLEAN, VA

LINTECH GLOBAL INC

LINTECH GLOBAL INC received $15M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 10 awards (−58% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $419.2M. Its largest customer was Defense Health Agency ($7.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$15M
New awards
10
Sole-source
12%
Single offer
19%
UEI
YT1QJBHRM6D5
Parent company
LINTECH GLOBAL INC
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 34.5MFY2017
  2. 51.2MFY2018
  3. 58.5MFY2019
  4. 30.8MFY2020
  5. 54.6MFY2021
  6. 52.5MFY2022
  7. 46.9MFY2023
  8. 39.2MFY2024
  9. 35.9MFY2025
  10. 15MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 6 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$15M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition31%
    US 39% · $4.6M
  • Sole-source awards12%
    US 30% · $1.8M
  • Single-offer competitions19%
    US 8.8% · $2.9M
  • Urgency justifications5.0%
    US 5.1% · $749.4K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Health Agency· Bexar County, TX· IT & telecom· Jul 15, 2021 – May 27, 2026· HT001121F0060
  2. Internal Revenue Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Mar 14, 2024 – Aug 23, 2026· 2032H524F00108
  3. Environmental Protection Agency· Middlesex County, NJ· IT & telecom· Dec 23, 2021 – Jul 9, 2026· 68HERD22F0017
  4. Washington Headquarters Services· Alexandria city, VA· IT & telecom· Aug 12, 2025 – Dec 6, 2025· HQ003425CE066
  5. Department of the Army· Macomb County, MI· IT & telecom· Aug 25, 2020 – Jan 19, 2026· W56HZV20FL195
  6. Environmental Protection Agency· Philadelphia County, PA· IT & telecom· Feb 27, 2025 – Nov 20, 2025· 68HE0325F0018
  7. Environmental Protection Agency· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Oct 24, 2023 – Aug 11, 2026· 68HERD24F0011
  8. Environmental Protection Agency· New York County, NY· IT & telecom· Mar 20, 2026 – Aug 26, 2026· 68HE0326F0012

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $59K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.6M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $2.7M reported

  1. BREMERTON, WA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MORGAN HILL, CA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. GROTON, CT · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. QBASE, LLC$104.8M−56% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesWashington Headquarters Services · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MIPPS, LLC$30.5M+20% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SUVI GLOBAL SERVICES LLC$86.6M+16% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Computer systems design and related servicesWashington Headquarters Services · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.