Federal contractor · TYSONS CORNER, VA

LMI CONSULTING, LLC

LMI CONSULTING, LLC received $521.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 83 awards (+52% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.2B. Its largest customer was U.S. Customs and Border Protection ($256.5M). It also received $93.1M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$521.6M
New awards
83
Sole-source
7.2%
Single offer
59%
UEI
QVEKLLJUGHJ7
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.3MFY2017
  2. 22.9MFY2018
  3. 97.3MFY2019
  4. 149.5MFY2020
  5. 220.1MFY2021
  6. 274.8MFY2022
  7. 221.7MFY2023
  8. 394.3MFY2024
  9. 343.3MFY2025
  10. 521.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 15 awards
  4. 5 awards
  5. 5 awards
  6. 8 awards
  7. 2 awards
  8. USTRANSCOM$6.5M1.3%
    4 awards
  9. 3 awards
  10. 10 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$486.7M93%
  2. Research & development$29.9M5.7%
  3. Facilities & utilities$4.7M0.9%
  4. IT & telecom$263.1K0.1%
  5. Education & social services$36.3K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition66%
    US 39% · $346.3M
  • Sole-source awards7.2%
    US 30% · $37.7M
  • Single-offer competitions59%
    US 8.8% · $308.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 7 awards
  2. Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards
  3. Department of Energy · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 27, 2023 – Sep 22, 2026· 47QFCA23F0053
  2. Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Mar 29, 2021 – Mar 11, 2026· W52P1J21F0209
  3. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· Marion County, IN· Professional services· May 20, 2026 – Sep 4, 2026· 70B01C26F00000320
  4. Office of Procurement Operations· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 22, 2020 – Apr 15, 2026· 70RWMD20F00000020
  5. Washington Headquarters Services· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 30, 2020 – Jan 29, 2026· HQ003420F0140
  6. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jan 19, 2022 – Apr 29, 2026· 75FCMC22F0010
  7. Department of the Air Force· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Sep 27, 2023 – Jun 12, 2026· FA701423F0240
  8. Office of Procurement Operations· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jun 5, 2020 – Mar 9, 2026· 70RFP320FREH00016

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

LMI CONSULTING, LLC received $93.1M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 3 actions (1 new awards), −6.8% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 12.631 · Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Educational Program: Science, Mathematics and Research for Transformation (SMART) ($93.1M).

Assistance · FY2026
$93.1M
New awards
1
Actions
3
Since FY2022
$458.3M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 70MFY2022
  2. 89.9MFY2023
  3. 105.4MFY2024
  4. 99.9MFY2025
  5. 93.1MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$93.1M100%

Top programs

  1. 12.631 · Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Educational Program: Science, Mathematics and Research for Transformation (SMART)$93.1M100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 12.631 · Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Educational Program: Science, Mathematics and Research for Transformation (SMART)· Department of the Army· Cooperative agreement· Feb 27, 2026 – Jul 15, 2026· W911NF262A043

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2022–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $12.7M (8 subawards)

7 primes

  1. CENTREVILLE, VA · 1 subaward
  2. HALVIK CORP$2.8M22%
    VIENNA, VA · 1 subaward
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  4. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  5. SACRAMENTO, CA · 1 subaward
  6. FAIRFAX, VA · 2 subawards
  7. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $27.6M paid out · $9.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $26.9M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $24.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $26.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $23.5M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $12.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

7 companies · $27.6M reported

  1. SAINT PETERSBURG, FL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. IDAHO FALLS, ID · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. EDGEWOOD, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

29 companies · $123.4M reported

  1. VIENNA, VA · 17 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 8 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 41 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MIRACLE SYSTEMS LLC$249.8M−68% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. SMARTRONIX, LLC$772.8M−60% in FY2026
    HOLLYWOOD, MD · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 11 entities · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesOffice of Procurement Operations · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services+4 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • LMI Consulting, LLCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.1M
16 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$50K
    1 reports
  2. 2024$270K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$1.1M
    16 reports
  4. 2026$550K
    8 reports

Top issues

  1. Homeland security21 reports
  2. Defense20 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations16 reports
  4. Veterans8 reports
  5. Health issues6 reports
  6. Small business6 reports
  7. Government issues5 reports
  8. Aerospace2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES11 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE11 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Van Scoyoc Associates$930K
    11 reports
  2. BALLARD PARTNERS$640K
    6 reports
  3. Capitol 6 Advisors$265K
    6 reports
  4. Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC$160K
    6 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 6, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.