Federal contractor · MACON, GA

LOGISTICS AND GENERATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC

LOGISTICS AND GENERATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, LLC received $58.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−88% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($58.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$58.7K
New awards
4
Sole-source
55%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
DY9VHTZHHQ84
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 99.7KFY2017
  2. 163.1KFY2018
  3. 887.6KFY2019
  4. 1.1MFY2020
  5. 653.7KFY2021
  6. 687.6KFY2022
  7. 909.2KFY2023
  8. 125.6KFY2024
  9. 494.4KFY2025
  10. 58.7KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$32.4K55%
  2. Equipment maintenance$26.3K45%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition55%
    US 39% · $32.4K
  • Sole-source awards55%
    US 30% · $32.4K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Contract Management Agency· Bibb County, GA· Professional services· Sep 29, 2023 – Apr 6, 2026· FA853423F0094
  2. Defense Contract Management Agency· Bibb County, GA· Professional services· Jun 20, 2024 – Mar 17, 2026· FA853424F0059
  3. Department of the Air Force· Bibb County, GA· Professional services· Jan 20, 2026 – Jan 20, 2026· FA853426F0017
  4. Department of the Air Force· Miami-Dade County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Oct 1, 2025 – Oct 1, 2025· FA664826FG029

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $84K reported

  1. WARNER ROBINS, GA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ANCHORAGE, AK · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. ESC, INC.$690.5K−98% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. MARLTON, NJ · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.