Federal contractor · ALEXANDRIA, VA

LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INCORPORATED received $29.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−17% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $248.6M. Its largest customer was Federal Acquisition Service ($28.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$29.7M
New awards
16
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.9%
UEI
MMJUKEH7ENA7
Parent company
LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-ownedHUBZone firm

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 38.5MFY2017
  2. 48.6MFY2018
  3. 19.7MFY2019
  4. 11.2MFY2020
  5. 2.1MFY2021
  6. 11.7MFY2022
  7. 11.6MFY2023
  8. 39.5MFY2024
  9. 36MFY2025
  10. 29.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 5 awards
  3. 3 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. U.S. Coast Guard$168.3K0.6%
    1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$33.1M100.0%
  2. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.9%
    US 39% · $257.6K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.9%
    US 8.8% · $257.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Federal Acquisition Service· Hillsborough County, FL· IT & telecom· Feb 2, 2024 – Sep 28, 2026· 47QFSA24F0001
  2. Department of the Army· Cumberland County, NC· IT & telecom· May 27, 2022 – May 29, 2026· W9124722F0117
  3. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· May 3, 2019 – Dec 17, 2025· W56JSR19F0072
  4. Department of the Army· Alexandria city, VA· IT & telecom· May 23, 2025 – May 20, 2026· W912DY25F0171
  5. Department of the Army· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Dec 28, 2020 – Dec 30, 2025· W9124J21F0013
  6. Defense Information Systems Agency· Anne Arundel County, MD· IT & telecom· Nov 3, 2016 – May 13, 2026· HC102816F0106
  7. Offices, Boards and Divisions· Alexandria city, VA· IT & telecom· Dec 9, 2022 – Dec 9, 2025· 15JPSS23F00000074
  8. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jul 12, 2022 – Jun 9, 2026· 70B04C22F00000626

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $33.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $1.6M reported

  1. ALEXANDRIA, VA · 2 subawards · Warehousing and storage
  2. GROTON, CT · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PYRAMID SYSTEMS, INC.$87.9M−27% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SEVATEC LLC$113.5M−96% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services
  3. INFINITY LABS LLC$82.5M−33% in FY2026
    BEAVERCRK TWP, OH · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Acquisition Service · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.