Federal contractor · BOISE, ID

M3 WORKS LLC

M3 WORKS LLC received $49.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−88% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $861.9K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($49.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$49.9K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
EKEHZREWBZ61
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 394KFY2024
  2. 418KFY2025
  3. 49.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$49.9K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Ada County, ID$49.9K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services· Ada County, ID· Professional services· Aug 27, 2025 – Aug 26, 2026· 12FPC325P0039
  2. Department of the Army· Ada County, ID· Research & development· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· W913E526PA006

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

M3 WORKS LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 34.2KFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2025.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BLAINE, MN · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveUnder Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. BRYAN, TX · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveUnder Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. EDWARD PETERSEN$740.8K−1.4% in FY2026
    NYSSA, OR · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveUnder Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.