Federal contractor · ELBA, AL

MA-CHIS-WB JV LLC

MA-CHIS-WB JV LLC received $837.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−85% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $13M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($778.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$837.1K
New awards
6
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
VEKQRPG4K5B8
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.8MFY2024
  2. 5.4MFY2025
  3. 837.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$837.1K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $837.1K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $837.1K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Gadsden County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 29, 2025 – Mar 5, 2026· W9127825CA014
  2. Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Construction & real property· Oct 24, 2024 – Feb 26, 2026· FA282325F0012
  3. Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 16, 2024 – Jan 30, 2026· FA282324F0382
  4. Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 20, 2024 – Jan 28, 2026· FA282324F0294
  5. Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Construction & real property· Aug 13, 2024 – Apr 10, 2026· FA282324F0254
  6. Department of the Army· Montgomery County, AL· Construction & real property· Feb 12, 2026 – Feb 12, 2026· W9127826FA064

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MESA VERDE ENTERPRISES INC$9.7M−94% in FY2026
    ALAMOGORDO, NM · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Highway, street, and bridge construction
  2. TAVARES LLC$10.7M−97% in FY2026
    CRANSTON, RI · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  3. KWAAN-NASCO JOINT VENTURE$10.9M−78% in FY2026
    KAKE, AK · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.