Federal contractor · MADISON, MS

MADISON SERVICES, INC

MADISON SERVICES, INC received $1.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+533% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.7M. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($1.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MEVKAUKMCVC5
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $1.8M in FY2026 together.

  1. MADISON SERVICES, INCMADISON, MS · Family page
    $1.8M
  2. -$7,646

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 19.3KFY2017
  2. 197.4KFY2018
  3. 181.7KFY2019
  4. 328.5KFY2020
  5. 678.7KFY2021
  6. 593.8KFY2022
  7. 386.3KFY2023
  8. 133.9KFY2024
  9. 292.1KFY2025
  10. 1.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.7M91%
  2. Facilities & utilities$174.5K9.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bowie County, TX$174.5K9.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Public Buildings Service· Suffolk County, MA· Construction & real property· Sep 28, 2026 – Sep 28, 2026· 47PF5126F0040
  2. Public Buildings Service· Somerset County, ME· Construction & real property· Nov 26, 2025 – Sep 24, 2026· 47PH5426F0009
  3. Department of the Army· Bowie County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Jun 27, 2024 – Apr 1, 2026· W9126G24F0254
  4. Department of the Army· Bowie County, TX· Facilities & utilities· May 13, 2026 – May 13, 2026· W9126G26FA041
  5. Public Buildings Service· Franklin County, ME· Construction & real property· Jul 13, 2026 – Jul 13, 2026· 47PC5226F0443
  6. Public Buildings Service· Franklin County, ME· Construction & real property· Feb 26, 2026 – Feb 26, 2026· 47PC5226F0154

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $66.7K reported

  1. MISSOULA, MT · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SDS JOINT VENTURE$1.7M+299% in FY2026
    ST GEORGE, UT · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Facilities support services
  2. SANTA ANA, CA · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Facilities support services
  3. ICONTROLS INC$1.8M−100% in FY2026
    LEES SUMMIT, MO · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.