Federal contractor · PHOENIX, AZ

MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS INC

MAINTENANCE ENGINEERS INC received $4.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−4.3% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $55.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($2.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4.2M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FFP4EKBBSGQ5
Small businessHUBZone firm

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 9.5MFY2017
  2. 10.2MFY2018
  3. 8.9MFY2019
  4. 5.5MFY2020
  5. 3.8MFY2021
  6. 2.9MFY2022
  7. 3.3MFY2023
  8. 3.2MFY2024
  9. 4.3MFY2025
  10. 4.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$4.2M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Kent County, DE$798.8K19%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Air Force· Kent County, DE· Facilities & utilities· Nov 17, 2022 – May 4, 2026· FA449723C0004
  2. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Facilities & utilities· Oct 16, 2025 – Apr 21, 2026· N4008526F0025
  3. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Facilities & utilities· Jan 29, 2025 – Mar 12, 2026· N4008525F2658
  4. Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Oct 29, 2025 – Mar 20, 2026· FA820126F0005
  5. Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Oct 28, 2024 – Mar 30, 2026· FA820125F0010
  6. Department of the Navy· Norfolk city, VA· Facilities & utilities· Jan 28, 2026 – Mar 2, 2026· N4008526F0320

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KOH GUMI & COMPANY$14.8M+1.2% in FY2026
    OKINAWA, JPN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Services to buildings and dwellingsNavy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. BEACON$15M−20% in FY2026
    SANTA MARIA, CA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Services to buildings and dwellingsNavy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. DESERT HAVEN ENTERPRISES$6.3M+38% in FY2026
    LANCASTER, CA · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.