Federal contractor · CENTREVILLE, VA

MAKPAR CORPORATION

MAKPAR CORPORATION received $4.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−86% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $114.1M. Its largest customer was Internal Revenue Service ($4.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$4.6M
New awards
11
Sole-source
22%
Single offer
78%
UEI
G61TZZQKC3L9
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned8(a) programHUBZone firm

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.9MFY2017
  2. 4MFY2018
  3. 4MFY2019
  4. 5.3MFY2020
  5. 7.3MFY2021
  6. 6.9MFY2022
  7. 21.9MFY2023
  8. 22.3MFY2024
  9. 33.9MFY2025
  10. 4.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 11 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$4.3M93%
  2. Professional services$328.3K7.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $4.6M
  • Sole-source awards22%
    US 30% · $1M
  • Single-offer competitions78%
    US 8.7% · $3.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Internal Revenue Service· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jul 26, 2023 – Aug 25, 2026· 2032H523F00366
  2. 8507$4.4M
    Internal Revenue Service· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jan 31, 2025 – Apr 21, 2026· 2032H525C00011
  3. Internal Revenue Service· Prince George's County, MD· IT & telecom· Oct 27, 2021 – Jun 4, 2026· 2032H522F00062
  4. Internal Revenue Service· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Dec 31, 2024 – Jul 8, 2026· 205AE925F00049
  5. Internal Revenue Service· Prince George's County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 24, 2024 – Jul 15, 2026· 2032H524F00726
  6. Internal Revenue Service· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Oct 28, 2024 – May 26, 2026· 205AE925F00012
  7. Internal Revenue Service· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 23, 2025 – Aug 25, 2026· 2032H525C00045
  8. Internal Revenue Service· Loudoun County, VA· Professional services· Aug 29, 2025 – Aug 14, 2026· 205AE925C00044

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · -$29.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $607.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $201.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $2.1M reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Business support services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. VIBRANTECH SOLUTIONS INC.$71.3M−0.5% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Computer systems design and related services
  2. IT FEDERAL SALES LLC$81.1M−24% in FY2026
    WINDHAM, NH · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Computer systems design and related services
  3. TECHNOLOGENT SOLUTIONS, LLC$41.5M−83% in FY2026
    CHANTILLY, VA · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Makpar CorporationAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$40K
2 reports
Lobbying · 2025–2026
$80K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2025$40K
    2 reports
  2. 2026$40K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Banking4 reports
  2. Financial institutions, investments and securities4 reports
  3. Government issues4 reports
  4. Science and technology4 reports
  5. Small business4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES4 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Thorn Run Partners$80K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.