Federal contractor · WEST CHESTER, OH

MALASHA TECHNOLOGIES INC

MALASHA TECHNOLOGIES INC received $15M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+6.6% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $76.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($15M).

Obligations · FY2026
$15M
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
TYGNVN2NS549
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 497.7KFY2018
  2. 1.1MFY2019
  3. 5.2MFY2020
  4. 8.7MFY2021
  5. 9.2MFY2022
  6. 14.3MFY2023
  7. 8.1MFY2024
  8. 14.1MFY2025
  9. 15MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$15M100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$15M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Butler County, OH$15M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $15M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $15M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. BSO52 ENTERPRISE BUSINESS OFFICE - OMN$36.8M
    Department of the Navy· Butler County, OH· IT & telecom· Oct 29, 2024 – Jun 2, 2026· N0003025C4301
  2. NAVY ERP FUNCTIONAL SME$4.1M
    Department of the Navy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Jul 15, 2019 – Oct 31, 2025· N0003019C0014

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $700K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $5.7M reported

  1. DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP$3.6M
    ALEXANDRIA, VA · 2 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SIGNIFICANCE INC$2.1M
    ANNAPOLIS, MD · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JMA RESOURCES, INC.$44.5M−48% in FY2026
    MECHANICSBURG, PA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. L3HARRIS LINCHPIN LABS, INC.$28.9M+6.5% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. DKW COMMUNICATIONS INC$39.5M+32% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.