Federal contractor · ATLANTA, GA

MALIK CONSULTING, INC.

MALIK CONSULTING, INC. received $6.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards. Since FY2017: $19.9M. Its largest customer was Internal Revenue Service ($4.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.9M
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
73%
UEI
N86NMKLWQ988
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.3MFY2017
  2. 1.7MFY2018
  3. 1.5MFY2019
  4. 1.6MFY2020
  5. 5.1MFY2021
  6. 1.5MFY2022
  7. 276.9KFY2023
  8. -25.6KFY2024
  9. 0FY2025
  10. 6.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$6.9M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition71%
    US 39% · $4.9M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$94.8K
  • Single-offer competitions73%
    US 8.7% · $5M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Internal Revenue Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Feb 2, 2026 – Sep 1, 2026· 2032L226F00021
  2. Internal Revenue Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Jan 30, 2026 – Feb 20, 2026· 2032L226F00014
  3. Departmental Offices· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Mar 30, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 2032L226F00044
  4. Treasury Common Services Center· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 2099AC26F00067
  5. Departmental Offices· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Mar 30, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 2032L226F00043
  6. Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Fulton County, GA· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2020 – Apr 9, 2026· 12314420C0064

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.5M (6 subawards)

3 primes

  1. BETHESDA, MD · 4 subawards
  2. OCTO METRIC LLC$312.7K8.8%
    ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $1.3M paid out · $96.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $57.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $13.3M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $5.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $7.9M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $3.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $1.3M reported

  1. CODIAK CONSULTING INC$852.6K
    VIENNA, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. BALTIMORE, MD · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $88M reported

  1. ATLANTA, GA · 23 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. BETHESDA, MD · 7 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 9 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GEN3 TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING LLC$4.6M−191% in FY2026
    POTOMAC, MD · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Computer systems design and related services
  2. MISSION-INSIGHTS LLC$5M+235% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Computer systems design and related services
  3. HERNDON, VA · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveInternal Revenue Service · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.